This multiple-choice quiz will test you on the Katzenbach v.Morgan Supreme Court case. In 1982, Congress amended 2 of the Voting Rights Act, 96 Stat. This is the issue that the Supreme Court dealt with in Katzenbach v. Morgan (1966). MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN delivered the opinion of the Court. 384 U.S. 641. In Katzenbach v. Morgan (1966), the United States Supreme Court ruled that Congress had not exceeded its authority when crafting Section 4(e) of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, which extended voting rights to a group of voters who had been turned away at the polls because they could not pass literacy tests.The case hinged on the Supreme Court’s interpretation of the Enforcement Clause … These cases concern the constitutionality of 4 … 803, 817, 15 L.Ed.2d 769, that '(t)he basic test to be applied in a case involving § 2 of the Fifteenth Amendment is the same as in all cases concerning the express powers of Congress with relation to the reserved powers of the States.' Katzenbach v. Morgan is a prime example of judicial deference to Congressional authority. In Katzenbach v. Morgan (1966) 384 U.S. 641 [16 L. Ed. Katzenbach v. Morgan, 384 U.S. 641 (1966), was a United States Supreme Court case regarding the power of Congress, pursuant to Section 5 of the 14th Amendment, to enact laws that enforce and interpret provisions of the Constitution. Supreme Court Cases. About This Quiz & Worksheet. This multiple-choice quiz will test you on the Katzenbach v.Morgan Supreme Court case.
That test was identified as the one formulated in McCulloch v. omitted.) 348, in which we upheld the constitutional validity of Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 against an attack no hotels, motels, and like establishments.
In 1965, Congress passed the Voting Rights Act (VRA). Allowing a broad reading of the Commerce Clause, the Court was instrumental in tearing down the discrimination in many establishments, and in preserving the progress achieved by civil rights activists in the 1960s. This case was argued with No. 515, Heart of Atlanta Motel v. United States, decided this date, 379 U.S. 241, 85 S.Ct. United States Supreme Court 384 U.S. 641 (1966) Facts. Start studying Con Law Cases. Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, and other study tools. Katzenbach v. Morgan & Morgan SCOTUS - 1966 Facts: Section 4(e) of the Voting Rights Act states that no person who has completed up through the 6th grade in any accredited school in PR where the primary language was other than English shall be denied … Marshall 2.

Katzenbach v. Morgan. 13 Though imperiled in Oregon v. Mitchell, 400 U.S. 112 (1970), the Morgan doctrine has been reasserted in more recent cases. 2d 828, 86 S. Ct. 1717], the court mentions "evidence suggesting that prejudice played a prominent role in the enactment of [New York State's English literacy] requirement" (Fn.